Thomas Arendsen Hein wrote:
* Richard Lowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20061025 16:17]:
You can circumvent performance problems by using a python extension
instead of shell skripts with decode/encode. Look at
hgext/win32text.py and contrib/win32/mercurial.ini for examples.
I see in-process python hooks, but not filters. Are these more recent than 0.9.1 or am I missing
something?
Yes, in-process python, but they are really encode/decode filters.
I don't see them. I see it for hook implementation, but not filter
implementation. (I'm looking at the tip of crew, for what it's worth).
Am I missing something? there being a hook that runs at the same time
as encode/decode filters for instance?
It does appear that filters only give you a pure input stream (either
via pipe, or temp file). I don't see any of the information needed for
keyword expansion being present.
The lack of a hook/filter propagation mechanism is not necessarily
immediately problematic, a workspace without the keyword implementation
would not in any way break it, it would just within itself lack expansion.
-- Rich
_______________________________________________
tools-discuss mailing list
tools-discuss@opensolaris.org
