>>>>> "Danek" == Danek Duvall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Danek> Yeah, but it's going to take more nimble mq operation than the Danek> more simplistic lumping of an entire wad into a single changeset. Danek> In particular, you're going to have to be constantly popping and Danek> pushing existing patches so that you can go back and make changes Danek> to a bugfix that's in a changeset lower down in the stack (and Danek> then merge any conflicts on the way back up). In fact, use of Danek> mq's patch versioning will probably be a great help here, but it Danek> adds to the complexity. This is making me nervous. How much experience is out there using mq that way? If the switch to Mercurial makes life harder for ON developers than it is today, we will have failed. mike _______________________________________________ tools-discuss mailing list tools-discuss@opensolaris.org
