> From various meetings with various people[1], it seems like we should > continue with the current putback policy. Stated explicitly: > > There will be no change in # of changesets/changegroup, or # of > bugs/changeset. Or more descriptively: > > 1) There will be no restriction on number of changesets fixed per > changegroup. You can address as many changesets in a putback as you like. > > 2) While there will be no restriction on number of bugs fixed per > changeset, it would behoove you (and whoever looks at the SCM history > after you) if bugs were separated out as much as possible. i.e.: if you > are fixing bugs which are completely independent and easily-separable, > please do so in separate changesets. If fixes for bugs are intertwined, > (i.e.: you are putting back a project which, in turn, fixes 9 other bugs > or something) then they may be combined into one changeset. > > Does that seem reasonable?
It's probably worth making one more (implied and frequently assumed) thing explicit: 3) There should only be one changeset per bug. Dave _______________________________________________ tools-discuss mailing list [email protected]
