>>>>> "sch" == Stephen Hahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
sch> I agree with basing the operation on the "putback -n" result, sch> unless Mike was after some specific state from wx? I would rather not re-invent, or even borrow, the code from wx to parse "putback -n" output. I'm fine with doing a "wx update" at the start of the script in order to get the most recent information. While it's true that wx is not required for general ON development, I believe it is widely enough used, and sufficiently robust, that it's reasonable to require its use for this conversion script. If necessary, the script can offer to run "wx init" for the user if there's no wx state. Of course, this is all assuming I write the script. If someone else wants to write it, I certainly have no objections to their parsing the output from "putback -n" in the conversion script. mike _______________________________________________ tools-discuss mailing list tools-discuss@opensolaris.org
