Suraj Verma wrote: > Hi, > We want to use onbld cstyle over C++ code. Generelly it works fine > except for a few errors which are allowed in C++ syntax. > > The most common example are > 1) Currently new/delete are not accepted as keywords and generate > "space before function paranthesis" error > 2) Currently template usage is flagged as "no space around relational > operators" error > 3) "// CSTYLED" should be accepted besides usual /* CSTYLED .. > > Since many people like to develop on C++, and they usually install > onbld with opensolaris, it would be very useful to users, if they > didn't have to hunt for another tool and could use these tools. > > To maintain backward compatibility, we could make these C++ checks > allowed only if some option is added. > > Please let me know if you think this makes sense, and any other > ideas/comments you have. > I am willing to take ownership and make changes if the proposal is > accepted. > Is it worth reviewing the rules to make sure idiomatic C++ doesn't cause errors?
Ian _______________________________________________ tools-discuss mailing list tools-discuss@opensolaris.org
