Mike Kupfer wrote:
"Rich" == Richard Lowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Rich> I certainly can't think of a solution I'd be happy with that
Rich> doesn't involve change to Mercurial, at least right now.
Rich> If we're changing mercurial in the first place, there's also
Rich> having 'hg merge' record its present state, and pick up where it
Rich> left off, too. (and refuse a commit while it's state file
Rich> exists).
Are we talking about things we want, but which can wait until after
we've moved the gate to Mercurial? Or are these showstoppers for the
migration? I think they're things we want soon, but they aren't
stoppers. Anyone disagree?
I don't consider these to be a showstopper for the migration, but I
haven't had to do those sorts of large complex merges before. It's
definitely something we want soon though.
cheers,
steve
--
stephen lau // [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 650.786.0845 | http://whacked.net
opensolaris // solaris kernel development
_______________________________________________
tools-discuss mailing list
tools-discuss@opensolaris.org
