On 2007-07-18 13:47, Chris Beal - Solaris Revenue Product Engineering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Giorgos Keramidas wrote: >>On 2007-07-18 13:37, Chris Beal - Solaris Revenue Product Engineering >><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Would there be a problem doing an hg push from an mq repository to a >>> non mq one? >> >> If a push is done when no MQ patches are applied, then no. >> >> If patches are pushed, an "hg push" is performed, and then patches are >> popped things may get messy (MQ changes the changeset hashes of patches >> when they are popped/pushed multiple times). > > So you would have to hg qpop -a and then re-apply your changes.
Indeed. > I don't think that would be a very easy way to work I think that's the main reason of the objections Darren J Moffat has for using MQ as a replacement/substitute of "wx backup". It's a different workflow, so it may not be such a good idea to try to squeeze the functionality of "wx backup" and "wx restore" out of MQ. _______________________________________________ tools-discuss mailing list [email protected]
