On 2007-09-14 08:23, Richard Lowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Vladimir Marek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>> For what it's worth, I would do (and do do) the multi-gate method, and >>> don't like the other branching at all. >> >> And can you limit new branches creation, or is it process which forbids >> (or does not encourage to) to create local branches and push them to >> server ? > > You should be able to disallow this with a hook on either side (if > incoming change would add an extra head, don't allow it to go back, or > roll it back). > > In general, mercurial will require you to force a push that adds an > extra head to the parent. I can't currently remember if this is the > case with formal branches too, or just extra heads (which are assumed > to be unmerged).
FWIW, there's an open bug tracker entry for this at: <http://www.selenic.com/mercurial/bts/issue736> It may be worth watching this BTS entry for interesting developments. _______________________________________________ tools-discuss mailing list tools-discuss@opensolaris.org
