* Peter Tribble <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-07 18:57]: > On 8/20/07, Stephen Hahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > As some of you have guessed, I've picked up a couple of other > > problems, which caused me to slow down on this particular issue. > > Is there a list of candidates anywhere? I don't seem to be able > to find a record of one. > > There's clearly bugzilla; you've mentioned roundup and gnats. > > Any others on the list?
http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/tools-discuss/2007-August/006839.html has links to two sets. > (I've had a look at something called mantis - http://www.mantisbt.org/ > for internal use at work. It looks like it will be somewhat easier for our > users than bugzilla, and seems as if it could align nicely with our > workflow. This would be for a rather different use case than would > be the case for OpenSolaris, though.) I went through the documents on the Mantis site above, and couldn't see how to satisfy E2. Selective differentiated access A mechanism must exist to indicate that a defect is private to a set of Participants, and no part of it may be made accessible to Participants not in that set, even if the defect's subcategory would otherwise cause it to be accessible. (DTS Administrators will have access to all defects.) This requirement is to allow for security coordination, and similar efforts. (Requests for differentiated access are expected to be managed by the Tools Group, the Board, or a designee. Distributions are expected to keep customer confidential data external to the Community DTS.) in the current version. Do you know if there's a standard way (or well-known extension) to do this in Mantis? - Stephen -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.sun.com/sch/ _______________________________________________ tools-discuss mailing list tools-discuss@opensolaris.org
