* Bonnie Corwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-23 20:13]: > Richard Lowe wrote: > >Stephen Hahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > >> All the details are in the subcategories, but here's the current > >> product/category (classification/product?) list that is published to > >> bugs.opensolaris.org from the legacy DTS. (Some subcategories are > >> excluded, apparently.) > >> > > > > > >It'd be work syncing up with Derek, and the owners of the excluded > >subcats (or even entire categories), to figure out which are intentional, > >and which are in error. Every so often we catch one that's hidden > >because that's how things default. > > [Sensible response from Bonnie.] Although I understand the interest, this thread is not about b.o.o. visibility/errors in visibility. It's about mapping the current bug categorization to the abstractions presented by the current DTS candidate in the sandbox, presumably by starting off with a check that the current approach to categorization is sane.
- Stephen * I'm rereading what became the "use of states" thread, and want to make a summary and a proposal. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.sun.com/sch/ _______________________________________________ tools-discuss mailing list tools-discuss@opensolaris.org
