On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 05:40:42PM +0000, John Levon wrote: > to pointless as we will still need DWARF->CTF for gcc. (Unlike
Well, it wouldn't be too hard to get gcc to generate CTF instead of DWARF. Every time I think I'm going to have free time I think maybe I'll do this but of course it never happens. Inability to distribute it without duplicating half of libctf is another demotivating factor. -- Keith M Wesolowski "Sir, we're surrounded!" FishWorks "Excellent; we can attack in any direction!" _______________________________________________ tools-discuss mailing list tools-discuss@opensolaris.org
