On Wed, 28 Nov 2007, Dave Miner wrote: > Valerie Bubb Fenwick wrote: >> On Wed, 28 Nov 2007, Dave Miner wrote: >> >>> Danek Duvall wrote: >>>> On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 02:41:59PM +0000, Darren J Moffat wrote: >>>> >>>>> How do I get a Buzilla category for http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz >>>>> added for an opensolaris.org hosted project ? >>>>> >>>>> ZFS Crypto in particular. >>>> Stephen and I (anyone else?) have admin access. >>> Comay, Glynn, Alan Burlison and I do as well. Thanks for doing this >>> one, Danek. >> >> Hi Dave - >> >> I brought this up to Danek offline, but I didn't realize there were >> so many administrators for this bugzilla instance, so I guess I should >> mention it on the alias. >> > > Glad I mentioned it ;-)
Thanks ;-) [...] >> That being he case, we should come up with some sort of guidelines for >> administrators to make sure these databases do keep in sync for the time >> being. For example, only adding things under product solaris to >> bugzilla that have already been added to bugster. >> > > When we create a "solaris" product in bugzilla I think that makes sense. My > belief is that we shouldn't create a "solaris" product until the OpenSolaris > community has decided that this is the DTS it wishes to use and we've sorted > out a way to provide the synchronization, because the potential for data loss > and confusion before then is a more significant negative than telling people > to use b.o.o to submit their bugs. Yes, that makes total sense. >> As far as making new "products" for development things, I would also >> advise that the maintainers come up with a policy for that. Consistency >> now will help you in the long term. I'd be happy to tell you how >> we handle this for bugster, but I think as long as you come up with >> something all administrators agree on, I think it'll be fine. >> > > From my point of view, the "development" products should correspond roughly > to projects, and I'm not clear how much more rigid that taxonomy needs to > be... it's pretty free form for what we do for bugster for development stuff, we just require an RM (required by bugster), IE (which I think is QA in this context?), and a description - and we ask that once they integrate that they promise to close off the old development stuff & move over any still open/relevant bugs/rfes to solaris. (so there won't be two places to track bugs, leading to confusion) Valerie -- Valerie Fenwick, http://blogs.sun.com/bubbva Solaris Security Technologies, Developer, Sun Microsystems, Inc. 17 Network Circle, Menlo Park, CA, 94025. 650-786-0461 _______________________________________________ tools-discuss mailing list [email protected]
