Alan Coopersmith wrote: >> I can't and don't speak for the other Website Project members, but >> personally I feel the OGB has disregarded both due process and common >> courtesy by heavily amending the proposal without giving the affected >> Project a chance to participate in the process. > > The OGB meeting was publicly announced and open to any members who wanted > to participate - that Steve was the only one of your proposed contributors > who did so was your choice.
Bearing in mind I received no feedback from the OGB on my final proposal, I didn't expect the OGB to hack it apart during the meeting. And as I've already said on several occasions, I couldn't attend the meeting in person. If there were problems, I expected that the OGB would have done the normal, sensible, courteous and community-minded thing and written a list of AIs and sent the proposal back to us to be amended. I still have had no explanation of why that was not done, and my expectations don't seem all that unreasonable. -- Alan Burlison -- _______________________________________________ tools-discuss mailing list tools-discuss@opensolaris.org
