On Thu, Mar 06, 2008 at 08:52:57AM -0500, James Carlson wrote: > Mike Kupfer writes: > > If a few people could sign up to test 1 tool each, we'd really > > appreciate it. The list of tools that need testing is at > > http://www.genunix.org/wiki/index.php/Developer_Tools (look for a status > > of TEST/REVIEW). If you'd like to help, please reply with the name of > > the tool that you'll be testing, and when you think you'll be done by. > > Then once you've done the testing, email > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] with what you found (looks done, needs > > work, etc). > > I've already tested "ws" and "wx" as well as the DbLookups used in > rtichk. Those all work correctly. > > I manually verified "rtichk," running it by hand with various CR > numbers and checking the results against RTIs I looked up through the > web interface. The results all checked out. > > As for ws, I entered both Teamware and Mercurial workspaces, checked > the environment strings, and diff'd them against the old ws > environment. It all checks out. > > With wx, I created a Teamware workspace, edited a few files, added > comments, ran "nits" and "pbchk", did a delget and a redelget, invoked > webrev and putback -n ... everything looks fine.
This wx is the same as /ws/onnv-gate/usr/src/tools/scripts/wx.sh correct? If so, then yes I'd say it's ready for review as it's only been used about a zillion times. 8^) On the other hand, I'm confused as to why wx is being reviewed since I thought the plan was to move to Mecurial not Teamware in which case wx becomes irrelevant. I'm sure I'm missing something here. -- Will Fiveash Sun Microsystems Inc. Austin, TX, USA (TZ=CST6CDT) _______________________________________________ tools-discuss mailing list [email protected]
