Brian Nitz wrote:
> Danek Duvall wrote:
>> It'd be easy enough to rename TRACKEDINBUGSTER to UPSTREAMDUP or something
>> else that was more generic.  Similarly, the BugsterCR whiteboard keyword
>> could become UpstreamCR, and we could add a UpstreamCRDB keyword which
>> could take an argument either of a URL or a keyword such as "gnome" or
>> "mozilla" which could be expanded by the tracking software.
>>
>> That's all a simple extension of the current idea, which may be enough, at
>> least for now.
>>   
> Yes that may be enough to do some useful things.  Are there any 
> objections or extensions to this approach?

It would seem generally more useful to expand the cross referencing 
capability generically.  Ie anyplace that a "bugid" is referenced, use a 
tuple consisting of { dts, key }.  Then "duplicate of" or "tracked in" 
(or "depends on" or "blocks") would work with any other system.

That's probably a prohibitive undertaking, but it would certainly be 
useful for Bugster AND for upstream defect tracking systems.

--Mark



>> All components being tracked on defect.os.o should have some form of
>> version tag corresponding to the distro milestones they can be associated
>> with.  (There's no multi-release as in Bugster, so when there are multiple
>> choices, someone will just have to make a decision.  Ditto for multiple
>> architectures.)
>>
>> Danek
>>   
> Yes, I find detailed revision tagging to be the biggest gap in existing 
> bug tracking systems, including bugzilla.  I like the concept of 
> "bugseverywhere" where bugs were stored in the source code management 
> system alongside the code.  That way if you create a branch, all bugs 
> existing at the branch point are automatically inherited to the new 
> branch.  If you close a bug in a branch, the "fixed" state is inherited 
> by every rev downstream from that state change.  We don't keep the bugs 
> with the code, but we can provide tools which make it easier to 
> associated a bug state change with the scm rev.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> tools-discuss mailing list
> tools-discuss@opensolaris.org

_______________________________________________
tools-discuss mailing list
tools-discuss@opensolaris.org

Reply via email to