> > Just 'hg log' or, for instance 'hg log -v'?
 > 
 > Ah, of course.  Yes, he's got log's default arg list set to -v.  That
 > mostly shouldn't be necessary now, with the ON hgstyle file he's using,
 > which does spit out the full description, rather than just the first line
 > (though the list of files isn't part of it; maybe that's what he's looking
 > for).

Ah -- I'd forgotten I'd done that -- thanks Rich and Danek! 

Still, a lot of times when I'm digging with "hg log" I actually want to
see the file list (i.e., I'll know the file of interest when I see it), so
I still find "-v" performance important.  Is "hg log -v" just inherently
slow (i.e. unusable) on large repos?

-- 
meem
_______________________________________________
tools-discuss mailing list
[email protected]

Reply via email to