Norm Jacobs wrote: > Danek Duvall wrote: >> Laszlo (Laca) Peter wrote: >> >> >>> On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 16:52 -0500, Richard Lowe wrote: >>> >>>> The 6880444 portion of these changes is necessary prior to >>>> /usr/bin/python becoming python2.6, which laca is planning to do very >>>> very soon (or may have already done, in the JDS gate), so I'd appreciate >>>> prompt response to at least that portion, which I will pull out of these >>>> diffs and integrate separately if necessary. >>> /usr/bin/python changes to 2.6 in build 130. The change is already >>> in the Desktop gate. >>> >> >> Huh. That means that this fix needs to get back into ON by Monday, which >> is kind of a quick turnaround. >> >> Where did this change get communicated? I didn't see it, but perhaps the >> appropriate c-team tech leads knew and I simply never saw the pass-down? >> >> > As long as the magic in /usr/bin/hg is '#!/usr/bin/python2.4' (which > it is), you'll should be fine. In 130, I am fixing some things in SFW > that have version agnostic magic in them.
Except in ON we have at least one file with #!/usr/bin/python that will end up wanting to import bits of mercurial, and will thus fail under python 2.6. So while in most cases you'd be fine, I really do need this reviewed *soon*. -- Rich _______________________________________________ tools-discuss mailing list tools-discuss@opensolaris.org
