Am 16/12/16 um 09:47 schrieb [email protected]:
When we closed the design phase of the FTL syntax for L20n, we decided to force
ourselves to work with the new syntax for half a year, collect feedback from
adopters and other stakeholders like tool authors, and only then come back to
review the syntax.
It's been over 6 months since and we (mostly :stas, :matjaz and :gandalf)
accumulated a number of items to review that are worth considering.
I'd like to respond to the nomenclature here.
I'm looking at the suite of threads and the "bi-annual review of the ftl
syntax" name for it, from the POV of a tool author or programm owner.
I'd turn around and leave, and look for an l10n tech that values my
investments for more than 6 months.
If we intend other people to put mindshare, time, and money into l20n,
we cannot have something like a bi-annual syntax review.
Axel
_______________________________________________
tools-l10n mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/tools-l10n
