Yes, I second Draicone, it should require an opt-in process of some description.
On 7/28/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Any system like this should require opt-in. It isn't hard to code, and it > avoids legal issues. Just require the user to make a dummy edit to their > user page while logged in with a specific, self-explanatory edit summary, > and check for it with the API, then maintain a database of verified users. > Heck, we could even do this in a toolserver-wide process, with one opt-in > system for all tools, and a centralised system with an API for checking if a > user is verified. > > -- > Draicone > > _______________________________________________ > Toolserver-l mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/toolserver-l > > -- Cheers, Daniel Bryant http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Daniel Wikipedia: The Free Encyclopedia
_______________________________________________ Toolserver-l mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/toolserver-l
