... and, why waste, what, $800 bucks on the base license, plus more on extra memory due to its bloat, plus even more due to terminal licensing 'n' number of users, when we can shell out the same amount of cash to get yet another toolserver? I mean, I'd rather two for the price of one than one for the price of two, wouldn't you guys?
-- Cheers, Kurt / "Slakr" @ en.wp On Wednesday 06 February 2008 15:18, Adam Dodek Michalik wrote: > 2008/2/6, Purodha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > I do not have or plan anything that would be useful to have > > one of the Windows O/Ses for. > > > > If someone else has - why not, if such a server could be made secure. > > Personally, I don't think there are things which can be done only > using Windows system. What's more, in my opinion remote use of Windows > isn't even half as convenient as Unix shell. I believe the idea of > running Windows toolserver is completely pointless. _______________________________________________ Toolserver-l mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/toolserver-l
