On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 5:08 PM, Simon Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I was actually talking about connecting the servers to the net down > different routes, ie multiple linecards, so if one went down, the other > would be there to take the load. Replicating the entire toolserver would be > way too much bother and expense, I agree, but surely another connection > can't hurt too much? > > (apologies if I've got completely the wrong end of the stick here)
Doubling the cost of switch ports (this isn't a $50 netgear we're talking about here…) to guard against some hours outage less-essential service against a failure mode that has only happened once in many years? Doesn't sound like much of a win. _______________________________________________ Toolserver-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/toolserver-l
