River Tarnell wrote: > Simon Walker: >> I presume he meant download.wikimedia.org > > i think it's very unlikely we'd run something like this on the static file > server. > > - river.
*If* there's such a need, it would be worth to take some CPU time from the servers doing dumps to fulfill it instead of making dumps faster when people is not using them and wishing something different. Changing a rendered mediawiki page into the "static dump format" is really cheap. I don't see the benefit, though. So let Peachey convince us and perhaps then it can be done :) _______________________________________________ Toolserver-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/toolserver-l
