-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 10-02-04 12:24 PM, River Tarnell wrote: > Many (most?) tools have no > copyright header or license, which makes it difficult to distribute them. > There have been some proposals in the past, like assuming tools without > licenses will use a particular license, but I'm not too fond of that.
We could require that users freely license their code - then you would know at least that the four freedoms apply and redistributing it wouldn't be so hairy. But of course, one is supposed to know precisely /which/ free license is used... - -Mike -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAktrFhIACgkQst0AR/DaKHv51QCgj/jTokhSPItI3ho7+uj6arU/ fRkAoNQFPbsgbczwGs2OlwEZHfqWSn97 =ZA+Z -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Toolserver-l mailing list (Toolserver-l@lists.wikimedia.org) https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/toolserver-l Posting guidelines for this list: https://wiki.toolserver.org/view/Mailing_list_etiquette
