-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Mashiah Davidson:
> I guess it is not possible to reduce the limit in the bot and keep
> bot's performance at least on the same level at the same time. You
> know administration well, I know the application domain of
> connectivity analysis.
>
> I really think that the only acceptable solution for golem to continue
> working is to get the limit removed. No matter if this will be
> achieved with additional memory installed to servers or any other way.
Sorry, but I don't see how spending EUR2'500 on additional RAM to
support a single tool is an effective use of WM-DE funds.
Perhaps you could consider a different implementation language? I don't
think shell scripts and SQL stored procedures are particularly
well-known for being memory-efficient.
> You also can introduce similar limit
> on thyme and daphna. Why not?
We will probably do this after a testing period on cassia (and hyacinth
when it returns).
- river
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (HP-UX)
iEYEARECAAYFAkuxLb8ACgkQIXd7fCuc5vJbfgCgm0qWQ6FH/aAyHG0tqsxqNP1o
228An1OlWpuMyjja5zkrKg7EiNJafKzj
=fww5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Toolserver-l mailing list ([email protected])
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/toolserver-l
Posting guidelines for this list:
https://wiki.toolserver.org/view/Mailing_list_etiquette
