DS> Ok, I guess such posts by tooldevelopers here always have to be taken DS> with a grain of salt. Of course in my world _my_ tools are the most DS> important ones for Wikipedia too ;-).
Hi, everebody! I'm sorry to be a newb in toolserver doings, but it seems there is some misanderstading of the appointment of [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Orphanage]] and Golem as a heart of this project. The main appointment of Orphanage project is to pay attention of wikipedians to such a problem as isolation of the article he is working on. In this meaning it seems to be incorrect to regard Golem as somebody's programming issue or something like that. I could not talk about programming features because I'm not a developer but I want to talk about Golem as a powerfull tool for improving wikipedias. In Ukrainian wikipedia we used it for a long time and highly appriciated its working. Thanks to Orphanage WikiProject we improved a lot of articles not only providing them with internal links but adding some interconnective information in articles that where marked with Golem-controlled bot. Properly speaking I request you to search an appropriate way to making possible Golem tool for important wikipedia purpose. Maybe there is sense to talk about Golem's work only in a number of wiki-projects (including uk-wiki) if this could lighten server's resourses. -- Sincerelly, Andrij Bondarenko (aka A1) _______________________________________________ Toolserver-l mailing list ([email protected]) https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/toolserver-l Posting guidelines for this list: https://wiki.toolserver.org/view/Mailing_list_etiquette
