On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 12:56 AM, Platonides <platoni...@gmail.com> wrote: > Ariel T. Glenn wrote: >> Στις 23-09-2010, ημέρα Πεμ, και ώρα 21:27 -0500, ο/η Q έγραψε: >>>> Given the fact that static dumps have been broken for *years* now, >>>> static dumps are on the bottom of WMFs priority list; I thought it >>>> would be the best if I just went ahead and built something that can be >>>> used (and, of course, improved). >>>> >>>> Marco >>> >>> That's what I just said. Work with them to fix it, IE: volunteer. IE: >>> you fix it. >>> >> >> Actually it's not so much that they are on the bottom of the list as >> that there are two people potentially looking at them, and they are >> Tomasz (who is also doing mobile) and me (and I am doing the XML dumps >> rather than the HTML ones, until they are reliable and happy). >> >> However if you are interested in working on these, I am *very* happy to >> help with suggestions, testing, feedback, etc., even while I am still >> woroking on the XML dumps. Do yuu have time and interest? >> >> Ariel > > Most (all?) articles should be already parsed in memcached. I think the > bottleneck would be the compression. > Note however that the ParserOutput would still need postprocessing, as > would ?action=render. The first thing that comes to my mind is to remove > the edit links (this use case alone seems enough for implementing > editsection stripping). Sadly, we can't (easily) add the edit sections > after the rendering. This should be doable using a simple regex which plainly goes for <span class="editsection">.
Marco -- VMSoft GbR Nabburger Str. 15 81737 München Geschäftsführer: Marco Schuster, Volker Hemmert http://vmsoft-gbr.de _______________________________________________ Toolserver-l mailing list (Toolserver-l@lists.wikimedia.org) https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/toolserver-l Posting guidelines for this list: https://wiki.toolserver.org/view/Mailing_list_etiquette
