On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 6:26 PM, Kalan <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 01:03, Krinkle <[email protected]> wrote: >> However it's not meant for timelines, use rev_timestamp >> instead. > > However, revisions having same rev_timestamp still should be ordered > by rev_id. There are pages that have had more than edit per second, > and this would ensure that the ordering is really correct.
No, no they shouldn't. Being an autoincrement field you shouldn't be using rev_id like that. _______________________________________________ Toolserver-l mailing list ([email protected]) https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/toolserver-l Posting guidelines for this list: https://wiki.toolserver.org/view/Mailing_list_etiquette
