On 22/05/12 11:22, Merlijn van Deen wrote: > How do we make sure tools do not disappear? By making multi-maintainer > projects for them. However, we see that this doesn't happen enough - > see also the thread about the expiration of soxred93's account. > > Options for improvement: > - better communication with wikis - which tools are used a lot and > *thus* should be moved to mmp's? > - easier creation of mmp's? I can imaging people don't move their > tools because it takes time to organise everything.
It's relatively hard to create a MMP. Compare that with the complexity of doing a mkdir for creating a project in your account. Add to that the relatively low interest of other people for maintaining external projects (as shown by Magnus mail). There's little reason to create a MMP in advance. Plus, each of is coding using different languages, conventions and "frameworks" (helper functions). Maybe we should use a model where stable tools are available in a repository where all users can commit. The code can only be updated through that. As an alternative, each project could be in either open-gate or closed-gate model. In the first one, anyone can commit there. In the second one, there's just a subset of users which can directly commit (commits by others must be approved by a project member). If the accounts for all the project members expire (it gets orphan), the tool automatically changes to open-gate mode. _______________________________________________ Toolserver-l mailing list ([email protected]) https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/toolserver-l Posting guidelines for this list: https://wiki.toolserver.org/view/Mailing_list_etiquette
