I agree with Roger. Both "QSL" and "CFM" are inefficient ways for indicating solid copy on CW. A simple "R" is all that's needed.
73, Joe K2XX On 12/13/2011 10:19 AM, Roger D Johnson wrote: > My pet peeve is the use of QSL. It's supposed to indicate the receipt of a > message. A simple "roger" will suffice for the receipt of a signal report. > > 73, Roger (no ten impunded) > > On 12/12/2011 4:06 PM, Carl Clawson wrote: >>> Another constant irking remarks extant is the use of "Roger" >>> in place of >>> "over" or "go ahead". To which I always remark..."my name is >>> Herb, not >>> Roger....... Roger? >> _______________________________________________ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
