On Sun, 2012-05-20 at 18:46 -0400, ZR wrote: > Yeah, I meant the current regulator. Shipboard power in the 30's wasnt > exactly stable. > > A simple converter to take 160 and 80 down to the RAK's best tuning ratio > band would be an interesting experiment. > > Carl > KM1H > >
Hi Carl, I gathered that from some of the RAL/RAL items I have read regarding less than the best power. When you mentioned the regulator I was a little confused so I looked again. Some of the articles I read called the current regulator a "ballast" tube. I have fooled around with a "converter" ahead of the RAK. It wasn't serious, just some haywired, temporary, experiment stuff. But it worked. One of these days I will build something a little sturdier and more permanent. Can you spell Q5er? 73, Bill KU8H _______________________________________________ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
