The plan is to develop a simple, relatively inexpensive, relatively light weight and shippable/airline transportable 160 antenna kit for one man quick deployment for modest DXpeditions or contributed for use by resident hams in rare-ish (for 160 m) locations.The ability to make adjustments to actual deployments to provide matching is important since such antennas are famously variable due to soil and local obstruction environment and there should not be a need for antenna matching hardware, especially at the planned higher powers.
First cut electrical design:Inverted L using telescoping aluminum tubes, two elevated radials and "hairpin" matching. Mechanical features of a prototype that was deployed: 9 Alum tubes 6', .058" walls, 2" diameter through 1" diameter -- this gives a 50' or 15.3 m mast (it can be pulled upright by 1 person, or probably telescoped up also) #14 wire ~ 28 m for top wire and 2X ~34 m radials (values after some adjustment, not unique, some tradeoff between the top and radials) Base - 2 thicknesses of Walmart (cheap 8X11") ΒΌ" plastic cutting board resting on ground with a ~ 1.5" wood cylinder bolted in the center.SO-239 connector screwed to the board. Guys -- 4X 3/32" dacron rope attached at 7 tube height, angled at ~ 45deg Guys held down by sandbags (very effective and moveable) Inv L top wire end was at ~ 2.5 m height with a support of opportunity (e.g., a tree) ~ 25 m from base Radials have their closest support near the base from plastic rings looped through each of an opposite pair of the guys at ~ 6 m high and 6 m from the mast.The radials therefore go from the base to the rings at about a 45 degree angle.(Elevating the base and everything else, by a meter did not seem to affect the impedance.Beyond that, supports of opportunity were used - above neck height is always nice. This produces, with some fiddling with wire lengths, an impedance around 20 -- j20 which can be matched using a practical "hairpin" coil shunt of inductive reactance ~ 45 ohms ( 4 microHenrys, say 5 turns 4" dia). More details of the test case including the EZNEC example are shown on my website.There are obviously a number of ways this design could be modified/improved, several discussed on the website.However, the tradeoffs with size, weight and complexity must be considered in the light of the mission here which includes transportability and ease of deployment. I am looking for collaborators to contribute ideas to help improve, and potentially, test design issues.Check out the website at http://n6mw.ehpes.com <http://n6mw.ehpes.com/> for the Itinerant 160 m antenna project expanded discussion toward the bottom. The immediate target is designing and assembling a respectable 160 m antenna that might go to KH8 on a DXpedition. Bill, N6MW billsstuff(at)gotsky.com _______________________________________________ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
