On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 6:07 AM, Eddy Swynar <[email protected]> wrote:
At that time, I established a dialogue with one of the committee members > who was situated in western Canada: as I recall, Frank had success in > expressing his concerns to him, but I don't recall the outcome of your > efforts. Did you, in fact, make a connection to the CAC through that > particular window of opportunity...? CAC members have a fairly limited role in situations like this. They are only called in to "advise" on specific questions that are handed down from HQ. They then go off and collect data on those questions. Think of them as survey coordinators who collect data from members of their division and roll that up into a report that goes back to HQ. The ARRL160 isn't everyone's cup of tea. It does however have a fairly long history as being an event that gets people in the USA and Canada fired up and on topband.. It is sort of like the ARRL Sweepstakes - but only on 160 meters. DX QSOs are allowed - but it isn't an international contest really. It is a very boring contest from Zone 21 for example. If we engineered all contests to be "perfect" from one perspective - all contest would end up being the same. I don't think it is that bad of a deal that we have three different 160 meter contests that are all different - and you can decide which ones are the ones you want to participate in. If you feel there is something missing from this equation - I invite you to sponsor a 4th one and then see if people "vote with their feet" and participate in the event. 73 Tree N6TR _______________________________________________ Topband reflector - [email protected]
