I'm feeling good. And lot of optimism for next night :) Result in contest is not very interesting, I need only some states to finish my WAS - 160m. From 5/7/0 area's. W0SD (S.D.) was great s7-8 during few hour's, called many times, but.....K0HA (NE) not so strong but some s5-7. Heard him few times. N8OO (LA) in morning hours s9 - worked only state-side,....many many call's. VY2ZM and K3ZM those two biggest signals, over s9.
Biggest signal's were 22-0145z. Later snow and QRM. About 04-05z all station's dissapear. Only few BIG ONE's. 73, Sam LY5W Vertical , BV, KW On 12/1/12, Jim F. <> wrote: > Hi Saulius, > > I know (almost) exactly how you feel :-) > > 73, > > jim / W1FMR / QRP. > > > > --- On Sat, 12/1/12, Saulius Zalnerauskas <> wrote: > > Spent whole night 2200z-0600z with 49 QSO's in the LOG. > Find one moment free frequence to call CQ. 1 call back to me from VE. > That's all. Full band 1800 KHz - 1880 kHz full of W/VE station's > making QSO's each-other, they are very LOUD, but don't hear EU :( > Maybe next night would be much more better!? > > Sam LY5W will be ready at 2130z > 49 QSO, 23 section's, long list of station's called but not worked, > called dozen of W5/W0 too with no luck > > On 12/1/12, Eddy Swynar <> wrote: >> >> On 2012-12-01, at 8:39 AM, Eddy Swynar wrote: >> >>> >>> I personally think that the notion of keeping 1825 - 1830-KHz "clean" of >>> NA stations calling CQ is a good one... >>> >> >> >> >> Hi All, >> >> Obviously this "typo" was a test meant to see if anyone was awake yet...! >> Hi >> Hi >> >> Of course I MEANT to say 1830- to 1835-KHz---but fat fingers (and a >> skinny >> mind) got in the way. >> >> Thanks go to Bert for keeping things on an even keel here... >> >> ~73~ de Eddy VE3CUI - VE3XZ > _______________________________________________ > Topband reflector - [email protected] > _______________________________________________ Topband reflector - [email protected]
