Dave, I have a lot of faith in NEC and N6LF's work, also. But I think the testing is required partly because we cannot successfully model Guy's folded counterpoise in NEC to determine the changes in ground loss, etc.
I would love to remote-switch between a few elevated radials and an FCP under an inverted-L here at my QTH. 73, Mike www.w0btu.com On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 8:21 AM, DAVID CUTHBERT <[email protected]>wrote: > Guy, > > why must we continually test NEC against measurements? The work by N6LF has > shown great correlation between simulation and the real world. > > Those of us who design electronic circuits (including EM) in the world of > computer simulation have great faith in the various programs and NEC-4 (and > possibly NEC-2) should give us an adequate A-B comparison. > > Dave WX7G > _______________________________________________ Stew Perry Topband Distance Challenge coming on December 29th.
