Paul Christensen, W9AC wrote:
The surface wave tool most be used in conjunction with the normal modeling application to get a complete and accurate vertical profile from 0 through 90 degrees.

Agreed.

That a vertical monopole 5/8 wavelength and less in height, using a less than perfect ground plane has a certain takeoff angle above the horizon where radiated field is maximum is a very common (almost universal) belief of ham radio operators This is based on the use of MoM software such as NEC to model only its far-field elevation pattern.

The graphic below shows a different conclusion when considering the surface wave in NEC evaluations, for the parameters shown.

The NEC far-field pattern for 0.1 km shows a maximum field intensity of 590 mV/m at an elevation angle of 23 degrees (the assumed "takeoff angle"). It also shows that the field at an elevation angle of 5 degrees is 348 mV/m.

The NEC surface-wave pattern for 0.1 km shows that the maximum field lies in the horizontal plane rather than at 23 degrees, and is about 890 mV/m rather than 590 mV/m.

The surface wave analysis also shows that the field radiated toward 5-degree elevation is about 850 mV/m, rather than the 348 mV/m shown by the far-field analysis. Of course, the ratios of these fields are even greater for elevation angles below 5 degrees, and infinite in the horizontal plane.

It is true that at great distances from a vertical monopole, the radiation present at low vertical angles is much less than at higher angles. But that does not mean that the greater radiation directed at low elevations __as launched by the monopole__ no longer exists. The radiation toward an elevation angle of 5 degrees shown in the surface wave plot continues in essentially a straight line, to reach the ionosphere.

It is the radiation launched at these low elevation angles that can provide the greatest single-hop range and fields for skywaves reaching that range, even though its existence might be unrecognized, or disregarded.

http://s24.postimg.org/6nchfpt1h/NEC_FF_vs_NF_Calcs.jpg

R. Fry
_________________
Topband Reflector

Reply via email to