Actually, Gary, if we triangulate using Victor's 150 deg bearing from Carroll, Ohio and your 180 degree bearing from SE CT, we could plot an intersection and figure out just about where the source is! I suspect that the "modulation" that Tim said was too rapid for QSB is likely due to swells and wave motion on the sea surface, and those carriers with no IDs may be NDBs on buoys on drift nets.
73, Charlie, K4OTV -----Original Message----- From: Topband [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Gary Smith Sent: Friday, November 01, 2013 1:18 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Topband: Steady Carrier on 80 CW 3.503.1 due south from SE CT. 3.501.6 due south from SE CT 73, Gary KA1J > There appears to be a second carrier coming from the same direction > on > 3503.1. It is not as strong as the one on 3501.4. So whatever is > going on - > two steady carriers are on the low end of 80 CW. > > 73, > Tim K3LR > > -----Original Message----- > From: Topband [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Tim Duffy > Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2013 10:45 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Topband: Steady Carrier on 80 CW > > I know this is the TopBand reflector - but there has been a carrier > on > 3501.4 for the past few days - that needs some DF work. > > It peaks at 150 degrees from K3LR so South South East. It is S9 this > evening > > Any ideas on what it is and where it is coming from? > > > > 73, > > Tim K3LR > > _________________ > Topband Reflector > > _________________ > Topband Reflector > --- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. http://www.avast.com _________________ Topband Reflector _________________ Topband Reflector
