The 100+ data point is relevant to the CQ WW CW contest - not the ARRL 160. The typical QSO totals for the ARRL 160 from Japan are much less due to low activity.
Tree N6TR On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 9:28 AM, Jim Brown <[email protected]>wrote: > On 12/11/2013 7:56 AM, Shoppa, Tim wrote: > >> After CQ WW CW, I was talking with a guy in Arizona who had worked 100+ >> JA's on 160 in that test! More than half a continent away, very different >> perspective on 160 than mine! >> > > Yep. 100+ 5,500 mile QSOs, but only 1 multiplier. > > As to EU -- I haven't heard EU on 160 in more than two years. > > 73, Jim K9YC > > _________________ > Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband > _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
