Guy and jim,
No, I'm not missing anything -- did you miss my words "first
approximation" in my description of the model? That model was a
feasibility study, not intended or accepted (by me, at least) as a
predictor of actual performance of an antenna on a building that we
known nothing more than a few dimensions. You are missing my point,
which is that, depending on the nature of the building roof and
structure, a horizontal antenna MIGHT be a very good one, and is worth
trying.
73, Jim K9YC
On Tue,8/11/2015 12:08 PM, Guy Olinger K2AV wrote:
No. You'd be missing the essential point which has to do with the
"shape" of the tool and whether it was remotely suited to the problem.
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
