I vote you take your contentious attitude somewhere else MIKE DURKIN Cecil K5DL
Sent using recycled electrons. > On Oct 20, 2015, at 1:07 AM, MIKE DURKIN <[email protected]> wrote: > > Come on Bill ... did i say you did ? >> also-- I did not put forth any opinion about ADC or SDR. > > Now, you said that you always read well written info from Tom, I didn't see > that structure ... > Id like to know what SDR was so poor. > > SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM ... (with a guys voice trying to sound like a old woman) > Flying Circus any one? > > >> From: [email protected] >> To: [email protected]; [email protected] >> Subject: Re: Topband: ADC Overload from MW transmitters >> Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 00:52:15 -0500 >> >> Mike-- >> It is obvious that you do not know who Tom is. >> and-- the word SPAM followed by six exclamation points IS an expletive. >> also-- I did not put forth any opinion about ADC or SDR. >> Bill--W4BSG >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: MIKE DURKIN >> Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2015 12:07 AM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: Topband: ADC Overload from MW transmitters >> >> If i must .... >> >> Tom never mentioned what type of SDR would be wiped out by moderate signals >> ... >> >> That in its self has three problems ... >> >> NO filtering? (should this be called -- comparing apples to apples, not >> apples to turds) >> poor ADC (real cheap soundcard 8bit)? >> insanely bad phase error in the nearby transmitter OR the wonderfull SDR >> that he built. >> >> Nearly the entire email was lamented as a setup for a flame war by simply >> omitting details ... that is not the actions of a good engineering radio >> operator ... hence ... SPAM. -- it was a showing off the effort put into the >> SDR i guess. >> >> And i worry about you Bill .... the word "SPAM" being an expletive in your >> vocabulary ... >> >> I think of many responses on here to ADC overload as this -- >> >> When dealing with a computer .. the quality of work/info put into it will >> have the same ratio that you will get out of it -- qubed. >> >> how many samples per second are true overload .... and i mean overload -- >> not phase error -- if you don't know the difference you really shouldn't put >> forth an opinion as truth. >> >> That video that was posted in this discussion(awhile ago) did point out the >> difference quite well and understandable by almost anyone .. check it out, >> if not again. >> >> Not sure if i should really send this .. but, what the hell. >> >> >> >> >>> From: [email protected] >>> To: [email protected]; [email protected] >>> Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 17:41:41 -0500 >>> Subject: Re: Topband: ADC Overload from MW transmitters >>> >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: MIKE DURKIN >>> Sent: Monday, October 19, 2015 10:47 AM >>> To: [email protected] >>> Subject: Re: Topband: ADC Overload from MW transmitters >>> >>> SPAM !!!!!! >>> >>> Mike-- >>> Can you explain this opinion? >>> In my experience, almost anything Tom takes the trouble to publish is well >>> thought-out and worth reading. Your expletive puzzles me. >>> Bill--W4BSG >>> >>> >>> --- >>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. >>> https://www.avast.com/antivirus >>> >>> _________________ >>> Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband >> >> _________________ >> Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband >> >> >> --- >> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. >> https://www.avast.com/antivirus > > _________________ > Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
