Perfect! Thanks for sharing. 73, Mike www.w0btu.com
On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 12:13 PM VE6WZ_Steve <[email protected]> wrote: > Know bad frequencies- great resource here: > http://www.k8nd.com/TopbandBadFreqs.pdf > > However…a “best practice” on 160m is NEVER call CQ on an exact frequency. > Why is it ever necessary to call on 1830, 1820, 1822 etc. exactly? Call CQ > on 1820.3, or 1820.4 or 1822.6 or 1827.8. > Perhaps its human nature to want to use a nice “round” number, but this > accomplishs nothing except increase the chances of being on a harmonic QRG. > Its surprising how many DX-peds will do this too. We don't need a nice > frequency with no decimal points! You will be found just fine with all the > skimmers and spotters out there. > > de steve ve6wz. > > > > On Nov 12, 2018, at 9:31 AM, Filipe Lopes <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi > > Is there a listing of such frequencies? Want to avoid those in the coming > contests > > 73's Filipe > CT1ILT CR5E CR6K > > Sent from my Huawei Mate 8 > > Na(o) Seg, 12 de nov de 2018, 17:28, Mike Waters <[email protected]> > escreveu: > > I wish we could get the word out to avoid frequencies like that: 1810, > 1820, 1830, etc. There are almost always AM BC harmonics on those freqs. > > 73, Mike > www.w0btu.com > > On Sun, Nov 11, 2018 at 4:24 PM k1zm--- via Topband < > [email protected]> > wrote: > > > Band still down a bit from last week but 4k6fo good sigs now on 1830.0 > from Alim. > 73 JEFF > _________________ > Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband > Reflector > > _________________ > Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband > Reflector > > _________________ > Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband > Reflector > > > _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
