Hi Rick, There is no problem modeling an FCP. You do have to do the parallel wires a certain way that’s documented in EZNEC since 1997 (version 2).
What do you perceive to be the issue? 73, Guy K2AV On Fri, Jan 8, 2021 at 11:10 AM Richard (Rick) Karlquist < [email protected]> wrote: > It would be interesting to compare an FCP to > N6BT's single spiral counterpoise. It models > well on EZNEC. The FCP, unfortunately, cannot > be modeled with NEC, AFAIK. > > Rick N6RK > > On 1/7/2021 9:35 PM, WI6X wrote: > > Ted, > > Read through Jim K9YC’s "Power Point slides for a presentation about > 160M antennas at Pacificon in October 2012. Getting On 160M From a Small > Lot (and Larger Ones Too). October 2012” > > http://k9yc.com/160MPacificon.pdf > > K2AV Folded Counterpoise information begins on page 68 of the PDF. > > 73, > > Jim WI6X > > > >> On Jan 4, 2021, at 9:47 AM, Salvatore [Ted] K2QMF <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> Hello Topbanders, > >> > >> I have an inverted "L" with 4 elevated radials! > >> I seem to have too much ground losses! > >> I am wondering if I can add an 160 FCP to help with the ground losses?? > >> Any info would be much appreciated! > >> Thanks and 73, > >> Ted K2QMF > >> _________________ > >> Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband > Reflector > > > > _________________ > > Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband > Reflector > > > _________________ > Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband > Reflector > -- Sent via Gmail Mobile on my iPhone _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
