Got him on 80m CW last night, but he was never better than a 449. No peep of them on 160m.
Ray, N6VR/W7YA Arizona On Mon, Jan 9, 2023, 10:42 AM Ron Spencer via Topband < [email protected]> wrote: > I agree with KQ2M, TN8K was workable last night (Sunday) on both 80 and > 160. Here in central NC they were actually better on 160. > > > > Long periods of very Q5 copy (maybe 10dB above the noise on 160) on both > bands followed by almost equally long periods of very light to no copy. > > > > I was monitoring ON4KST chat and Ludek, the op on 80 cw said he heard me > several times before I actually heard him reply. So even though, as he > noted, they are surrounded by storms, their receive beverages are working > well. > > > > Very nice of them to listen towards the US on both bands and especially > appreciated, on CW. > > > > Ron > > N4XD > > > Sent using https://www.zoho.com/mail/ > _________________ > Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband > Reflector > _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
