Christoph; The solution is to assert owl:Thing for the affected classes in your ontology. We will look into alternatives, but this is the necessary solution for the time being. -- Scott
On Oct 16, 4:36 am, Christoph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks, Scott. Is there a reason for this that not all classes are > shown anymore in the class tree view after reasoning? Is there a > solution? Because I cannot search for all classes to have a look if > the subclassOf owl:Thing is being lost. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TopBraid Composer Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/topbraid-composer-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
