Yes, AG 3.1 was published after TBC 2.6.2, so we naturally cannot support AG 3.1 yet. We will include the latest version in the 3.0 release of TBC. I haven't looked into whether AG has changed their API, so I cannot say whether upgrading will work at this stage. From this point of view, AG 3.1 is currently unsupported in TBC, at least officially.
Holger On Nov 3, 2008, at 9:16 AM, Matt wrote: > > I think TBC 2.6.2 is only using AG 3.0 and not AG 3.1. > > C:\e\configuration\org.eclipse.osgi\bundles\591\1\.cp\lib has > (1) agtbc-3-0.jar > (2) com.franz.agraph-3-0.jar > > In 3.1 they got rid of a seperate jena jar from their main jar and now > just use agextn-3-1.jar > > Might this be affecting things? How do I upgrade? > > On Oct 27, 2:58 pm, Matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I am the most current, stable versions of TBC 2.6.2 and AG 3.1 Java >> Edition using Jena Extensions on Windows Vista using Eclipse Version: >> 3.4.0 I made 2 triplestores in AG. Both are located in the same >> location (i.e. C:\ag\triplestores) but with different triplestore >> names. In all my tests, the only thing I vary is the name of the >> triplestore in all of the configuration code. >> >> PROBLEM1 >> >> I can execute a bit of JENA/AG code to through straight JAVA, input a >> file.OWL into an AG triplestore. I can verify the size of the AG >> triple store before and after. Example: I have a file called cdm.owl >> and it has 44 triples. I upload this file to AG through JENA, and >> the >> resulting AG TripleStore has 44 triples. When I do an >> fsModel.differences(agModel) and agModel.differences(fsModel) I get >> no >> differences either way. Also, I can verify by looking at the change >> in several key files in the AG TripleStore. >> >> However, when I try to connect to the AG triplestore (using the exact >> same information that I use to connect to it through the ag/jena >> code) >> I see only 4 triples in the triple view: >> >> (1) ontology:CDM rdf:type owl:Ontology >> (2) ontology:CDM.owl rdf:type owl:Ontology >> (3) ontology:standard.owl rdf:type owl:Ontology >> (4) ontology:standard.owl rdf:type owl:Ontology >> >> PROBLEM2 >> >> So looking at the problem from another perspective, I was interested >> to see if I could "export" cdm.owl to Allegrograph via Export- >> >Export/ >> Merge/Convert RDF Graphs0>AllegroGraph Database Stoarge (*.allegro) >> format >> >> TBC can in fact export the file.owl into the AG TripleStore. >> However, >> there are 55 statements (verse the 44 when I do it through JENA). >> Now, it shows up in TBC Triples View but it doesn't show up in the >> code! I correctly connect to the AG TripleStore (which shows there >> are 55 triples in the triplestore), but when I query the JENA Model's >> size through Jena code, it says the size is 0. >> >> best, >> mmv >> >> ps sorry for taking so long to get back, had a few fires to put out. >> >> On Oct 14, 9:13 pm, Scott Henninger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >> >>> Matt; Chances are that they are there in Composer-ME, but lack >>> RDFS/ >>> OWL constructs to view the triples in, for example, the Classes >>> hierarchy. Check the Triples tab (Show View -> Triples) to see if >>> the >>> triples are visible to Composer. If the problem is that the classes >>> are not appearing in the Classes hierarchy, the class defs may use >>> rdfs:Class instead of owl:Class. Look for these in the Classes >>> hierarchy under rdfs:Class (make sure "Start hierarchy with >>> owl:Thing" >>> is turned off). >> >>> If these don't resolve the problem there are the usual questions >>> about >>> versions (both Maestro and Allegro), OS, what parts aren't appearing >>> as expected, etc. >>> -- Scott >> >>> On Oct 14, 5:28 pm,Matt<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>>> When I connect to AllegroGraph through TBC (http:// >>>> agraph.franz.com/ >>>> tbc/Using_TopBraid-Composer_with_AllegroGraph.pdf) the model is >>>> empty >>>> even though I know there are statements in the triplestore. I >>>> tried >>>> changing the Prefix and BaseURI (as you can see below) that I use >>>> in >>>> code to successfully pull up the model. However, while I can >>>> verify >>>> the statements exist in code, I can't see them in tbc. >> >>>> #AllegroGraph metadata for TopBraid >>>> #Tue Oct 14 11:19:44 CDT 2008 >>>> Prefix-rdf=http\://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns\# >>>> Prefix-=http\://www.phinformatics.org/Ontology/Tester1.owl\# >>>> Prefix-xsd=http\://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema\# >>>> Host=154.230.22.14 >>>> Name=default >>>> Prefix-owl=http\://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl\# >>>> Port=4567 >>>> Prefix-rdfs=http\://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema\# >>>> Directory=C\:\\test\\Ag\\ts >>>> BaseURI=http\://www.phinformatics.org/Ontology/Tester1.owl > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TopBraid Composer Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/topbraid-composer-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
