Hello fellow, in the Allemang/Hendler book, on page 130-131 there is a discussion about OWL to Extend OWL. I want to make sure I understand the ramification of this type of assertion.
If I were to import a file.owl that contained the triple: owl:inverseOf rdf:type owl:SymmetricProperty . it would redefine owl:inverseOf for all instances right? I guess what i am asking is when one goes about redefining items in the owl namespace, appropriate care must be given to the scope of those assertions. Just like rdfs:domain and rdfs:range, the inferences are aggresive and must be treated with care. --tk -- "The nervous system organizes itself so as to compute a stable reality" - Maturana & Varela --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TopBraid Composer Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/topbraid-composer-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
