Thx, this works. Please keep the box red in case no commas are used as seperators (if possible; guess not since the alternative usa might require this alternative syntax form...)
Thx, Michel -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Holger Knublauch Sent: 09 March 2009 22:52 To: [email protected] Subject: [tbc-users] Re: How to define allowed/enumerated values? Ah yes, interesting case! Sorry I gave the wrong advice before: The correct syntax is to put commas (,) between the literals. I am surprised that our parser otherwise simply treats the " as normal characters. ["CURVE", "AREA"] Thanks for your patience Holger On Mar 9, 2009, at 2:44 PM, Michel Bohms wrote: > > > This was actually the way that caused a non-red box but also the wrong > owl code... > > gui box: ["CURVE" "AREA"] > > source code: > <owl:DataRange rdf:ID="ProfileTypeEnum"> > <owl11:onDataRange rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2001/ > XMLSchema#string"/> > <owl:oneOf rdf:parseType="Resource"> > <rdf:first rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/ > XMLSchema#string" >> CURVE" "AREA</rdf:first> > <rdf:rest rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax- > ns#nil"/> > </owl:oneOf> > </owl:DataRange> > > in other words: a list with one wrong item... > > Michel > > > On 9 mrt, 22:24, Holger Knublauch <[email protected]> wrote: >> Ok, this case requires a different syntax, because the values of >> owl:oneOf are rdf:Lists. Use the notation >> >> ["A" "B" "C"] >> >> for those direct values (and any rdf:List) on the form. >> >> Holger >> >> On Mar 9, 2009, at 2:18 PM, Michel Bohms wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >>> ok, clear, but... >> >>> what do I fill in the GUI field which makes the box not red AND >>> results in the right OWL code? >>> (more precise: in the oneOf filed in the resource form for a >>> DataRange instance (in my example: ProfileTypeEnum). modelling a >>> user-defined enumeration type) >> >>> thx again, Michel >> >>> On 9 mrt, 21:18, Holger Knublauch <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Hi Michel, >> >>>> there are two kinds of enumerations in OWL (both using owl:oneOf), >>>> and the help page "How to... Create an enumeration" only talks >>>> about one of them. >> >>>> 1) Enumerated classes are defined as enumeration of RDF resources - >>>> these can be created with the provided wizard and using { ... } >>>> notation. >> >>>> 2) Enumerated datatypes are defined by typing in something like >> >>>> rdfs:range: owl:oneOf{"A" "B" "C"} >> >>>> The latter is probably what you are after. You can also use the >>>> same construct in owl:allValuesFrom restrictions. >> >>>> I will extend the help page to make this clearer. >> >>>> Holger >> >>>> On Mar 9, 2009, at 12:51 PM, Michel Bohms wrote: >> >>>>> Can someone explain me how to define enumerated values in TBC? >> >>>>> In the manual it says: >> >>>>> Enumerated classes >>>>> Enumerated classes using the owl:oneOf operator can be entered by >>>>> a list of values between curly brackets. For example, {Cairns >>>>> Sydney Canberra} >> >>>>> defines the class consisting of only the three individual cities. >> >>>>> when I do this: >> >>>>> fill in your GUI owl:One ofbox: {CURVE AREA}, the box stays red. >> >>>>> idem for a variant: {"CURVE" "AREA"} >> >>>>> I can get rid of the red box by: >>>>> ["CURVE" "AREA"] >> >>>>> but this is not according to the manual and the owl code is >>>>> wrong... >>>>> (the string CURVE" "AREA becomes one item...) >> >>>>> thx Michel > > This e-mail and its contents are subject to the DISCLAIMER at http://www.tno.nl/disclaimer/email.html --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TopBraid Composer Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/topbraid-composer-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
