Thanks for the example file. This is the same scenario that I played with here.
And I can confirm that drag and drop on the property was broken in beta1. There is an error message in the Error Log. This bug has been fixed in the meantime and will be working again with beta 2. Thanks for your patience, Holger On Mar 11, 2009, at 7:18 AM, James A Miller wrote: > > I made the following test case. In 3.0, it would not allow me to > drag the TC class onto the AP label on the GUI, like I could > before. It predefined the type as String, and even when I dragged > TC into the text field, it converted it to a String, instead of a > reference. > > <?xml version="1.0"?> > <rdf:RDF > xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"; > xmlns:TBC="http://www.rtn.ncs.k.com/TBC#"; > xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#"; > xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#"; > xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"; > xml:base="http://www.rtn.ncs.k.com/TBC";> > <owl:Ontology rdf:about=""> > <owl:versionInfo rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string > " > >Created with TopBraid Composer</owl:versionInfo> > </owl:Ontology> > <owl:Class rdf:ID="TC"> > <rdfs:subClassOf rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/ > owl#Thing"/> > </owl:Class> > <owl:Thing rdf:ID="Thing_1"> > <TBC:AP rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string"; > >TBC:TC</TBC:AP> > </owl:Thing> > <owl:AnnotationProperty rdf:ID="AP"/> > </rdf:RDF> > > > I brought up 2.6, and did the same thing. It allowed me to drag TC > onto the AP tag, and that produced the following: > > <?xml version="1.0"?> > <rdf:RDF > xmlns:TBC="http://www.rtn.ncs.k.com/TBC#"; > xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"; > xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#"; > xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"; > xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#"; > xml:base="http://www.rtn.ncs.k.com/TBC";> > <owl:Ontology rdf:about=""> > <owl:versionInfo rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string > " > >Created with TopBraid Composer</owl:versionInfo> > </owl:Ontology> > <owl:Class rdf:ID="TC"> > <rdfs:subClassOf rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/ > owl#Thing"/> > </owl:Class> > <owl:Thing rdf:ID="Thing_1"> > <TBC:AP rdf:resource="#TC"/> > </owl:Thing> > <owl:AnnotationProperty rdf:ID="AP"/> > </rdf:RDF> > > <!-- Created with TopBraid Composer --> > > Note that the TBC:AP resource is not typed at all, but IMHO that is > better than applying a String every time. The loss of the drag and > drop is inconvenient. > > Jim Miller > Principal Software Engineer > Raytheon NCS, Largo, FL > (727)768-8942 > > > > > Holger Knublauch <[email protected]> > Sent by: [email protected] > 03/10/2009 06:56 PM > Please respond to > [email protected] > > To > [email protected] > cc > Subject > [tbc-users] Re: Annotation properties in latest TBE > > > > > > Hi James, > > I don't think anything has changed since 2.6. I just verified that > it still behaves as it should: When an annotation property (or any > other) has no range (or owl:allValuesFrom), then you can assign > either literals or resources to it. So please double-check that no > range exists. The system just displays a string field as default for > empty rows, but you can also use Add existing... to add existing > resources, or if possible use drag and drop. If you enter a string, > you can later change its datatype using the Change datatype context > menu item. > > If you are unsure, you would need to provide details on the exact > definition of the annotation property (maybe send source code of it). > > Holger > > > > On Mar 10, 2009, at 3:43 PM, James A Miller wrote: > > > Sorry--I typed TBE when I meant TBC-M. I am using 3.0.0.62. > > Specifically, I have displayed an individual. I dragged an > AnnotationProperty into it. And when I try to drag something (a > Class) onto the AnnotationProperty, my mouse cursor just goes away. > The default row, and 'Add empty row' gives me a row with a > predefined data type of 'S' (String)--I want it to be generic (non- > specific type), like in 2.6. I didn't have any better luck with > Select Existing. > > The core problem is that I can't seem to link two classes via an > AnnotationProperty, but I could before. Is there a newer version of > the application? > > Jim Miller > Principal Software Engineer > Raytheon NCS, Largo, FL > (727)768-8942 > > > > Scott Henninger <[email protected]> > Sent by: [email protected] > 03/10/2009 05:46 PM > Please respond to > [email protected] > > > To > TopBraid Composer Users <[email protected]> > cc > Subject > [tbc-users] Re: Annotation properties in latest TBE > > > > > > > > > Jim; It works in 3.0 beta as well. Given an annotation property > appearing on the Form, you can Add empty row... and drag/drop a > resource into the field. > > I'm guessing you have some other way of doing this? I'm a little > unclear on what is meant by "load the Object". > > -- Scott > > On Mar 10, 4:19 pm, James A Miller <[email protected]> > wrote: > > I think there is a new "feature" in the new TopBraid, and I don't > know if > > I have been misusing Annotation Properties, or maybe I'm somehow > using TBE > > incorrectly. > > > > I have an Annotation Property, and I am trying to load the > Object. TBE > > shows it to be a String field, and won't let me drop an Object > there. Is > > it illegal to have an AnnotationProperty that points at a URI > reference? > > If it is legal, how do I get TBE to accept it? > > > > This worked, allowing me to point at an Object URI, in TBE 2.6x > > > > Jim > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TopBraid Composer Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/topbraid-composer-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
