Hi Paul, thanks for the report. We are using a third-party RDFa parser based on an XSL-T stylesheet. Looks like we should replace this with a more complete parser. I have noted the link below and hope we can integrate this (Python-based) solution for a future release.
Disclaimer: I am not really an RDFa expert, so I trust that you have verified that the file indeed has the correct syntax with regards to the current spec. Holger On Mar 13, 2009, at 2:33 AM, PaulZ wrote: > > The RDFa import doesn't seem to be complete. > > Input file > <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML+RDFa 1.0//EN" "http:// > www.w3.org/MarkUp/DTD/xhtml-rdfa-1.dtd"> > <html > xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"; > xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"; > xmlns:test="http://test/"; > xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema/"; >> > <head> > <meta property="dcterms:creator" content="Blah" datatype="test:class"/ >> > <meta property="dcterms:title" content="bv" xml:lang="nl"/> > <link rel="dcterms:creator" href="http://test/Blah"/> > <title>Untitled Document</title> > </head> > <body> > > </body> > </html> > > After import i do not seem to have the datatype and xml:lang info, > while using the same file on > http://www.w3.org/2007/08/pyRdfa/ keeps both. > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TopBraid Composer Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/topbraid-composer-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
