James; The idea of sybtyping xsd classes is how one would do this in XMLS, using a simple or complex type. But these are not supported in the RDF/XML syntax.
For the enumerated types, the best solution is to use a data range that uses an enumerated class (owl:oneOf). For restricted types (only 2 characters of type xsd:string, etc.) the standard is to use OWL 1.1 user-defined datatypes. -- Scott On Mar 20, 2:24 pm, jlapalme <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > My objective is to define a classes of specific simple value type such > as precise list of either strings or interger, etc... Some of this > classes have enumerable members under not. Ideally, for non-enumarable > members I DON'T want to use 1.1 facets, I really would like to a nmaed > OWL class. > > How do I do this in a way which is compatible with OWL and Topbraid. > > Naively, I tried to subclass xsd:string, xsd:interger, etc... but > theontology becomes invalid.... > > Cheers, > > James --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TopBraid Composer Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/topbraid-composer-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
