Sorry, that should read "setting the domain/range of a property"
-- Scott On Apr 13, 9:33 am, Scott Henninger <[email protected]> wrote: > RDFS/OWL is *not* an object-oriented model. It is a set theoretic > model. A type triple (rdf:type) states that a resource is a member of > a set (class). rdfs:subClassOf states that a class is a subset of > another. > > Properties of classes are not inherited, although properties can be > associated with classes by either setting the domain/range of a class > (RDFS) or property restrictions on a class (OWL). > > -- Scott > > On Apr 13, 9:21 am, [email protected] wrote: > > > Is this so because the Ontology is not a true-classical OO model? > > > Narsim Ganti > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [email protected] > > > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of mwz > > Sent: Monday, April 13, 2009 10:13 AM > > To: TopBraid Composer Users > > Subject: [tbc-users] properties assigned to super class > > > Hi, Eveyone, > > > I found it is interesting that properties assigned to a super class > > are not automatically given to its subclasses. I think properties in a > > super class works like a template so subclasses should inherit all > > properties from the super class. > > > Is it true in TopBraid or there is some mistakes I made? Thank you > > very much. > > > Mingzhen --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TopBraid Composer Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/topbraid-composer-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
